NETGEAR C6250 VS MOTOROLA MG7540 – Which is a better choice for gaming?

If you’re looking for home router for streaming gaming and daily regular use, Netgear and Motorola have some of the best selections. The following is an in depth review of two of their top products: the Netgear C6250 and Motorola MG7540.

Having your own modem is not only economical but also much better than renting from your internet service provider. This is because you can go for a modem with router functions, also known as modem routers. Two of the best modem routers in the market now are the Netgear C6250 and Motorola’s MG7540. The modem routers are mid-range products offering similar performance with little minor differences that we’ll look at in the following table.

What are the differences between Netgear C6250 and Motorola MG7540 modem routers?

Netgear C6250 vs Motorola MG7540 – How do they compare?

These two modem routers are similar in a number of things. The following are some of their top features.

Performance and speed

Among the top consideration when looking for a modem router is its performance. The performance refers to the maximum speed the unit can provide in a real world environment. Here, the Motorola excels by far much more than the Netgear modem router. First, the Netgear C6250 is an AC1600 rated dual band router. This speed however is not the actual performance. When tested, the router provides up to 120 Mbps. On the other hand, the Motorola is a high speed device designed for heavy internet use, streaming, gaming and more. In fact, when tested, the speeds were found to be 375 Mbps which is excellent. If speed and power is what you’re looking for, then consider getting the Motorola unit.

Design and structure

Released by different manufacturers, these two devices differ heavily in their design and structure. Here, we’ll consider how practical and striking they are. And again, the Motorola MG7540 is better when it comes to design. First the Motorola modem router features a slim tower design that comes in either black or white. The exterior design is a mix of matte and glossy finish where the control and LEDs are located. It also sits on a separately attached base that gives it an attractive edge in looks. Overall, the unit is quite catching and beautiful. When it comes to its practicality, the unit comes with four gigabit Ethernet ports which is ample for physical connections. On the other side, we have the Netgear C6250. Its design has constantly received mixed reviews due to the huge size. This makes it difficult to place and position in your house and the large facing glossy front causes unnecessary reflections. Furthermore, the unit comes with two gigabit Ethernet ports and one USB 2.0 port. Motorola MG7540 again beats out its rival due to its practical size and Ethernet ports.

Compatibility with internet service providers

Being both modems and routers, these two devices have to be compatible with your internet service provider. Here, the Motorola and Netgear tie as they both do well in ensuring they are compatible with all major ISPs in the US. They are compatible with Xfinity by Comcast, Spectrum, Cox and more. However, it is important to note that these are all cable (coaxial) internet providers. The devices are not compatible with fiber ISPs and wireless ISPs such as Verizon and AT&T and DSL.

Mobile apps

Another important factor to look at is the respective mobile apps for the Netgear C6250 and Motorola MG7540. In this category, the Netgear modem features a better app than the Motorola router. This is because the netgear genie app is one of the best router mobile apps today. It is compatible with both Android and iOS and has been optimized to provide quick, easy and efficient installation. In fact, the Netgear C6250 take just about five minutes to install and configure. Motorola’s app is slower. Its user interface has also received mixed reviews. In addition, the Motorola App does not offer as many features as the Genie app.

Netgear C6250 vs Motorola MG7540 – A comparison review

Netgear C6250

NETGEAR Cable Modem Wi-Fi Router Combo C6250 - Compatible with All Cable Providers Including Xfinity by Comcast, Spectrum, Cox | for Cable Plans Up to 300 Mbps | AC1600 Wi-Fi Speed | DOCSIS 3.0

• COMPATIBLE WITH ALL MAJOR CABLE INTERNET PROVIDERS: Including certification by Xfinity by Comcast, COX,...
• SAVE MONTHLY RENTAL FEES: Model C6250 replaces your cable modem and WiFi router saving you up to 168...

Check Price

The Netgear brand has been providing us with some of the best networking products for decades now. One of their quiet, under the radar products is the Netgear C6250. The unit is a modem router that was launched in 2017. Being a hybrid device, it offers both the functionality of a router and a modem. What this means is that can be connected to your cable ISP, convert the signal to a digital wave and transmit wirelessly via Wi-Fi. The unit is a mid-level product that offer excellent speeds for gaming, 4K streaming and regular day to day surfing. It is compatible with all the major cable internet providers in the US such as Comcast, Cox and Spectrum among others. And that’s just the modem part of it. As a router, it provides excellent Wi-Fi performance in both speed and range. It is rated at 1600 mbps but in real world, it provides speeds of up to 120 Mbps – enough for gamers and streamers. In range, the device covers up to 1500 square feet and allows up to 25 devices to connect simultaneously. The following are its pros and cons

Pros

• It features DOCSIS 3.0 technology
• Fast Wi-Fi speeds of up to 120 Mbps
• Excellent range for small to medium houses of up to 1500 sq. feet
• Great security from the WEP, WPA, WPA2 protocols
• The Netgear C6250 is affordable

Cons

• Large and bulky design make it difficult to position
• Two gigabit internet port. It could be more for the price

View Price on Amazon

Motorola MG7540

MOTOROLA MG7540 16x4 Cable Modem Plus AC1600 Dual Band Wi-Fi Gigabit Router with DFS, 686 Mbps Maximum DOCSIS 3.0 - Approved by Comcast Xfinity, Cox, Charter Spectrum, More

• 16x4 DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem plus a built-in AC1600 Dual Band (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) WiFi Gigabit Router with...
• Requires cable Internet service. Approved by Comcast Xfinity and Xfinity X1, Cox, Charter Spectrum,...

Check Price

Motorola is known for its fast speed devices and the Motorola MG7540 upholds this reputation. It is a beast in performance although it’s also rated as an AC1600 Mbps router. When tested in a real world environment, the unit was found to provide speeds of about 375 Mbps which is more than double the Netgear unit. It makes this unit the better choice for anyone that downloads large files or streams is high resolutions. And even with this, the price tag is rather decent costing just a few bucks more than the Nteagr C6250.

When it comes to design, the Motorola excels due to the simple yet elegant slim tower design it implements. Furthermore, it also comes with four gigabit Ethernet ports, is compatible with all major internet service providers and offers amazing security

Pros

• High speeds of about 375 Mbps
• The device is compatible with all major cable internet service providers
• Four Ethernet ports for physical connections
• Great security from the WEP, WPA, WPA2 protocols
• Affordable and offers great value for money

Cons

• Tower design requires space
• The wi-fi range is questionable

View Price on Amazon

Conclusion

In conclusion, both these units are great depending on what you’re looking for. If speed and performance is what you want, go for the Motorola MG750. But if you need great range at a lower price, the Netgear C6250 is the better choice

Verdict: So which is better? Netgear C6250 or Motorola MG7540

Overall, the Motorola MG7540 is the better choice. This is because it offers excellent speeds for multiple users simultaneously while still implementing a much more striking design than the Netgear C6250.

FAQs

1. Do either of these products overheat?

Yes. The Netgear C6250 has been found to get too warm from time to time

2. Does the Netgear C6250 support DOCSIS 3.1?

No. It supports up to DOCSIS 3.0